LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH
From: Jeff Pang <jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Thu, 10/16/08, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH
> To: jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx, "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." 
> <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 7:49 AM
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Jeff Pang wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have chosen SH as the scheduler algorithm on my LVS.
> > All run file, requests from client A will always go to
> realserver A.
> > But, when realserver A got died, client A's
> requests continues to go to realserver A.
> > I have two realservers, why LVS didn't redirect
> client A's requests to realserver B?
> > failover failed on SH algorithm?
> 
> LVS doesn't do failover. Some external agent has to
> handle 
> it. Did you tell the director that realserver A doesn't
> 
> exist anymore?
> 

Yes, I'm using ldirectord.
When the realserver was down, ldirectord has put its weight down to 0.



      



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>