![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH |
| From: | Jeff Pang <jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:32:05 -0700 (PDT) |
--- On Thu, 10/16/08, Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH
> To: jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx, "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list."
> <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 8:40 AM
> Jeff Pang wrote:
> > When the realserver was down, ldirectord has put its
> weight down to 0.
> >
> > Yes, I'm using ldirectord.
> Weight to 0 means no more new connections, but existing
> ones (in the SH
> way) will still hit the real server
>
"existing ones" means existing connections or existing clients? thanks.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH, Graeme Fowler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] RX Packet drops on high traffic LVS in DR setup, Sashi Kant |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH, Graeme Fowler |
| Next by Thread: | [lvs-users] Question regarding LVS/DR setup, Erik Weber |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |