lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH |
From: | Jeff Pang <jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:32:05 -0700 (PDT) |
--- On Thu, 10/16/08, Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH > To: jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx, "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." > <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 8:40 AM > Jeff Pang wrote: > > When the realserver was down, ldirectord has put its > weight down to 0. > > > > Yes, I'm using ldirectord. > Weight to 0 means no more new connections, but existing > ones (in the SH > way) will still hit the real server > "existing ones" means existing connections or existing clients? thanks. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH, Graeme Fowler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] RX Packet drops on high traffic LVS in DR setup, Sashi Kant |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH, Graeme Fowler |
Next by Thread: | [lvs-users] Question regarding LVS/DR setup, Erik Weber |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |