|  | 
lvs-users
 | 
| To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH | 
| From: | Jeff Pang <jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx> | 
| Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:32:05 -0700 (PDT) | 
| 
--- On Thu, 10/16/08, Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH
> To: jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx, "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." 
> <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 8:40 AM
> Jeff Pang wrote:
> > When the realserver was down, ldirectord has put its
> weight down to 0.
> >   
> > Yes, I'm using ldirectord.
> Weight to 0 means no more new connections, but existing
> ones (in the SH 
> way) will still hit the real server
> 
"existing ones" means existing connections or existing clients? thanks.
      
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH, Graeme Fowler | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] RX Packet drops on high traffic LVS in DR setup, Sashi Kant | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH, Graeme Fowler | 
| Next by Thread: | [lvs-users] Question regarding LVS/DR setup, Erik Weber | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |