LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH
From: Jeff Pang <jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Thu, 10/16/08, Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Thomas Pedoussaut <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] failover on SH
> To: jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx, "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." 
> <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 8:40 AM
> Jeff Pang wrote:
> > When the realserver was down, ldirectord has put its
> weight down to 0.
> >   
> > Yes, I'm using ldirectord.
> Weight to 0 means no more new connections, but existing
> ones (in the SH 
> way) will still hit the real server
> 

"existing ones" means existing connections or existing clients? thanks.


      



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>