|
> Is it possible that all the devices in use for that customer are
behind
> some form of NAT device, so they all appear to be coming from the same
> IP and port?
>
> Alternatively, it may be that the sudden inrush of connections makes
the
> realserver responses get delayed, so they remain at "inactive" (that
is,
> half-open in this context) and therefore not contributing to the load
> count - meaning the scheduler still schedules new connections in to
the
> realserver with the least "active" (fully open) connections.
>
There is no NAT involved between Loadbalancer and Clients. The
Loadbalancer sees the clients IP addresses. I should add: this
infrastructure is part of a VPN we are running with the GSM provider.
Yep, this is exactly what happens, the connections stay "half-open", and
therefore there is no add on the connection count. This is why I was
aksing for a way to include the inactive connections in the directors
decision.
Regards
Peter
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
