|
BTW, I forgot to mention that with Piranha, you can ONLY do EITEHR lvs OR
fos but NOT both at the same time.
>
>Dear John Cronin,
>
>> > I have setup a primary node, a backup node and two
>> > real servers for my LVS. However, if not mistaken, I
>> > know that piranha canot handle lvs and failover at the
>> > same time. Is there any solutions to make lvs and
>> > failover possible at the same time?
>>
>> I am not clear what you are trying to accomplish here. If you
>> want failover between the primary LVS directory, and the backup,
>> my impression is that Piranha should in fact handle that properly.
>> Otherwise, what would be the point of having a backup director?
>>
>> I think it is in the realservers where you can have load balancing,
>> or failover, but not both. That is moot however, since with nanny
>> and a loadbalancing Piranha setup, failed servers are supposed
>> to be removed from the routing table, which is failover as far
>> as a load balancing service is concerned. Failover is just
>> a way of using a third party (the director) to heartbeat two
>> services and control failover between them.
>
>What I mean is when I configure the failover between primary and backup
>node using piranha, it is doing failover only. The primary or the backup
>(when primary is fail) node didn't do the load balancing to the 2 real
>servers. Is there any ways that I want to have failover between the
>primary and backup node, and at the same time, when requests come in,
>load balancing is functioning. (The primary or the backup will load
>balance the requests to the real servers)
>
>
>
>Thank you
>
>
|
