LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [Ultramonkey-devel] patch for ldirectord to support master server

To: Alois Treindl <alois@xxxxxxxx>, ultramonkey-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Ultramonkey-devel] patch for ldirectord to support master server
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: andreas.koenig@xxxxxxxx (Andreas J. Koenig)
Date: 13 Jun 2001 10:10:25 +0200
>>>>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 20:47:49 +0200 (METDST), Alois Treindl 
>>>>> <alois@xxxxxxxx> said:

  > I have created a patch for ldirectord.
  > The purpose of the patch is to solve this problem:

  > my set of http servers is tightly bound with a mysql database server;
  > the interactive website does not work if the DBMS is not available.

I have argued in a different thread on the lvs list that this is your
application's fault. Your application must be able to respond to the
failure of a dependency. If it did, you could easily use ldirectord to
fulfill your needs.

My impression is that this patch is the wrong solution to a
non-problem. Sorry if this sounds drastic, but you have not (to my
knowledge) answered several postings in the other thread and have not
yet discussed alternatives. Please do before proposing a patch.

Ldirectord is a very sensible piece of software needed by thousands of
users. We should be very careful in extending it to keep it
maintainable.

-- 
andreas


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>