LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Name based virtual hosts and persistence

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Name based virtual hosts and persistence
From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Sep 2001 14:04:18 +0200
Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> > I haven't done this, and this is just off the top of my head, but
> > you could setup using fwmarks. You could give fwmark=1 to the
> > regular service and a persistent fwmark=2 to the other service.
> 
> hmm, I don't see why you can't do this with just a regular VIP:port
> and a persistent VIP:port. The two entries in the ipvsadm table are
> independant.  I know you explained your situation in detail, but I
> don't have the answer

This should be easy using NAT, but the OP said he used DR.  I don't
think routing can care about port numbers.  Perhaps an additional
IP-address for each RS can do the trick.


Kjetil T.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>