On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> My apologies to the list if this messages show up twice or thrice.
> >On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 18:17 +0100, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> >>>Well, to make sure the service is up, really. I wanna make sure that a
> >>>user can actually log in, ideally. We're using a system to chroot sftp
> >>>users into their accounts, and if I can test to that point, that would
> >>Would it be ok if the health check connects to your sshd, logs in and
> >>executes a command?
> >Perhaps. The sftp is the real purpose for the server, so it would be
> >best to test it out *shrug*
> Sigh, I've tried with my poor perl knowledge to work on ldirectord,
> however I failed due to CPANs borkeness. It's not possible to install
> Net::SSH::Perl on my machine, but I send you my ideas as a patch if
> you're interested in pursuing further attempts at an improved health
> check. It also has support for a possible SFTP health check. The patch
> on top of that incorporates the patch for the external command check:
> I haven't incorporated my SQL fixes and support for Oracle yet:
> Since the current patch is bigger then the ldirectord source (darn
> Eclipse auto-formatted the whole source), I've also put the new
> ldirectord onto the webserver referred to below. Let me know if you find time
> to experiment with it. This is my gift to you as an apology for not having
> properly read your email in the first place.
> Horms apparently has fallen off the earth, but I've cc'd him anyway,
> just in case he re-surfaces anytime :).
I'm here, just super-busy. But if you want my attention just CC me :-)