lvs-users
|
To: | Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing |
Cc: | tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:00:00 -0800 |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 05:53:18PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote: > > This I don't know, but as I understand it, remote mail targeted for the > primary is held on the secondary only until the primary becomes available > again and the secondary host is only queues the mail. That depends on how the secondary is configures. The secondary could queue the mail and then forward it, it could deliver it by some means, it could throw it away :) Of course this depends on the mail software you are using, but that is just an implementation issue. -- Horms |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Jeremy Hansen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Jeremy Hansen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Jeremy Hansen |
Next by Thread: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Jeremy Hansen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |