LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: question about using MX's for load balancing

To: John White <johnjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: question about using MX's for load balancing
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 20:52:46 -0500 (EST)
This one I missed.  What does nfs have to do with delivering the mail from
the secondary machine?  This one really confuses me, sorry, I'm probably
just not thinking of what you're saying logically.

-jeremy

> On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 06:04:47PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> > 
> > Well I'm using qmail and just from my experience I don't know of anything
> > off hand to have a secondary qmail host go ahead and deliver the
> > mail.
> 
> Well that's an easy one to answer:
> 
> If both the primary and secondary mount the mail delivery partions
> via NFS, then both the primary and secondary can deliver mail there.
> 
> There is no rule mandating that a secondary queues mail until the
> primary is available.  That's just a very convienient way to do it.
> 
> John
> 
> 


http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>