![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing |
| Cc: | tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| From: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:07:47 -0800 |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 06:04:47PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote: > > Well I'm using qmail and just from my experience I don't know of anything > off hand to have a secondary qmail host go ahead and deliver the > mail. This is something I have to look further into, but as far as using > this method over using an LVS machine to do the balancing, do you see any > pros or cons? I think that the IPVS soulution has to be better as it pushes management onto the local network, rather than DNS which is a distributed (chached) database. -- Horms |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Jeremy Hansen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Horms |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Jeremy Hansen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, John White |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |