lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing |
From: | John White <johnjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:02:41 -0800 |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 06:04:47PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote: > > Well I'm using qmail and just from my experience I don't know of anything > off hand to have a secondary qmail host go ahead and deliver the > mail. Well that's an easy one to answer: If both the primary and secondary mount the mail delivery partions via NFS, then both the primary and secondary can deliver mail there. There is no rule mandating that a secondary queues mail until the primary is available. That's just a very convienient way to do it. John |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Matt Holtz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Jeremy Hansen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Horms |
Next by Thread: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Jeremy Hansen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |