lvs-users
|
To: | Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing |
Cc: | tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:30:59 -0800 |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 06:08:38PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote: > > Also another things I thought of, if all the machines have the same > priority MX, then will mail actually fail over to a secondary MX in that > case? How at that point if they all have the same priority determine > which host to defer mail to? > All MX's of equal perferance should be tried, though not in any partucular order. -- Horms |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Horms |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Matt Holtz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Jeremy Hansen |
Next by Thread: | Re: question about using MX's for load balancing, Matt Holtz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |