lvs-users
|
To: | Stephen Zander <gibreel@xxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LVS use for mass-webhosting companys: Does it make sense ? |
Cc: | Jochen Tuchbreiter <jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Robert C." <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:43:52 -0400 (EDT) |
Ahh, when GFS is stable in certain areas, journalling, etc, man, it's gonna be sweet. -jeremy > >>>>> "Jochen" == Jochen Tuchbreiter <jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jochen> I wonder if dual-homed-SCSI RAID solution will work fine > Jochen> with Software-RAID - does anyone have practical experience > Jochen> with this ? Dual-Homes SCSI sounds like a really > Jochen> interesting solution to me ... > > As a general comment, Dual-homed SCSI is *not* for the faint of heart. > You might as well go to gfs, although that still has major drwbacks in > the face of sytem failure. > > -- http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------- |
Previous by Date: | Re: LVS use for mass-webhosting companys: Does it make sense ?, Wayne |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LVS use for mass-webhosting companys: Does it make sense ?, Andreas Schiffler |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LVS use for mass-webhosting companys: Does it make sense ?, Christopher Briggs |
Next by Thread: | Re: LVS use for mass-webhosting companys: Does it make sense ?, Kyle Sparger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |