|
Thanks for the clarification Stephen.
Christopher.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Zander [mailto:gibreel@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 9:57 PM
To: Christopher Briggs
Cc: Wayne; Stephen Zander; Jochen Tuchbreiter; Robert C.;
lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LVS use for mass-webhosting companys: Does it make sense ?
>>>>> "Christopher" == Christopher Briggs <hpuxadm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Christopher> Are we suggesting that an admin could have DB files
Christopher> on an individual PV that is linked between two
Christopher> systems(easily done) and have them mounted at that
Christopher> same time without data corruption?
I'm not. :)
The original poster was describing a read-mostly environment where all
writes occured on a single master server. Under those conditions you
could safely mount the f/s read-only on the slave server though
you'd have to make sure that you called sync(2) afetr every write or
could accept some slight discrepencies bewteen master & slave.
Anything more involved than that needs the cooperation of the two
kernels involved, hence my comment about gfs.
--
Stephen
"A duck!"
|
