|  | 
lvs-users
 | 
| To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Scalability | 
| From: | bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
| Date: | Tue, 16 May 2000 12:27:22 -0400 | 
| 
No. They are simply offering Red Hat 6.1, which naturally comes with LVS.
They are also clustering 256 Netfinity Servers as a 'super cluster' using
Linux - sort of like Beowulf. My statement simply reflected that LVS comes
in the Linux kernel.
Bobby Moore Worldspan
bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                                                
                             
                    Horms                                                       
                             
                    <horms@vergen        To:     
lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                            
                    et.net>              cc:                                    
                             
                                         Subject:     Re: Scalability           
                             
                    05/16/2000                                                  
                             
                    12:13 PM                                                    
                             
                                                                                
                             
                                                                                
                             
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 12:05:09PM -0400, bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Absolutely.
>
> My problem here is not that I have to try to sell LVS to my bosses, but
> that I have to sell Linux to them. IBM has been a big help. I think that
> LVS will sell itself. I'm not sure they realize it yet, but IBM offers an
> off-the-shelf load balancing solution by running <distro> Linux on their
> Netfinity Servers.
Is that the WebSphere product?
--
Horms
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 
 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Scalability, Ratz | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Scalability, Ratz | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Scalability, Horms | 
| Next by Thread: | lvs bottlekneck, Cono D'Elia | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |