LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Scalability

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Julian Anastasov'" <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Scalability
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>, S Ashok Kumar <gsaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Peter Martin <p.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 16:43:47 +-100
        The  only thing I can do  is to explain the details.
The  users always have questions about the LVS internals.  I
can't  tell you "You must use LVS  - It is free".  There are
so  many things that must be  considered. May be the simpler
answer  is "Buy hardware for load balancing. It has good TCP
stack  and  it  is  without  bugs  and  ...".   May  be this
hardware  is better, may be the support is better.  Why not!
Why the only load balancing solution must be LVS?


I can't understand all this bickering, these people give thier time freely to 
DEVELOP and SUPPORT this excellent product.

Review the doc's ask a few questions then stand in awe..

How much does a PC cost?  when you don't need to buy an OP/SYS and Load 
balancing software!!

My (small) LVS run's on P75 32Mb Ram, what's that about £100 Sterling!
You won't get a hardware router for 3x that!

Keep up the good work!

Peter Martin
Computer Operations Manager
Initial Shorrock Security



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>