LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Scalability

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Scalability
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 08:57:23 -0700
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 08:38:38AM -0400, bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> My LVS's had a ONE-TIME cost of around $50.00, and access to a broom closet
> full of discarded p133's and p200's. For that $50 I also got 'heartbeat',
> mon, ipchains, iptraf, power tools, a programmable unix environment, a
> plethora of monitoring and benchmarking tools, enough routers, firewalls,
> and virtual servers to potentially put throughout our entire enterprise,
> and TONS of free help and support, not to mention my company's appreciation
> to solutions to some problems that have been dogging us for quite some
> time. I haven't had a throughput problem yet. I haven't stress-tested it
> yet. But my plan is to simply add another LVS and use DNS to round-robin
> them - something we're doing today with another product. To me, the
> potential of this is enormous. I'm starting to see the huge benefit of open
> source. This is not a marketing pitch. Marketing is not my business. There
> is a beauty to LVS, and as a programmer I'd rather have this type product
> to run on this type of system to do what I want with, and produce products
> that will work for me, and to give my 'clients' what they want, rather then
> have them play by my rules. My bent, of course, is that of a programmer and
> not a network guy.
> 
> Bobby Moore Worldspan
> Phone: 770.563.7362 Fax: 770.563.6406
> bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Wow, can we quote you on that? I think that the LVS page could do with
some comments like that.

-- 
Horms


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>