LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: ldirectord question

from [Horms] [Permanent Link]
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ldirectord question
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 00:16:10 -0400 
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:16:31PM -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> 
> Even for fwmark?  I'm confused now.
> 
> -jeremy
> 
> > Virtual address should be in the  n.n.n.n:p format.

No, for fwmark services the virtual address should be an integer
as you have it.

It seems that fwmark support is broken in the ldirectord 1.17, I am
working on a patch to fix this.

-- 
Horms
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: ldirectord question, Horms
Next by Date:  Re: Route through rather than connect to possible?, Joseph Mack
Previous by Thread:  Re: ldirectord question, Jeremy Hansen
Next by Thread:  Re: ldirectord question, Jeremy Hansen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]