LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: ldirectord question

To: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ldirectord question
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:35:17 -0400 (EDT)
Perfect.

Horms is the best!

-jeremy

> On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 03:59:31PM -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> > 
> > So I had a dream last night and it told me to try playing with fwmark
> > stuff again.  I found an errata on UltraMonkey's page which I believe is
> > what I was missing when I previously tried to get fwmark working before.
> > 
> > But now I'm running into another problem with ldirectord, 1.17 included in
> > heartbeat 0.4.8e
> > 
> > My ldirectod.cf
> > 
> > checktimeout=3
> > checkinterval=1
> > 
> > virtual=1
> >         real=10.2.9.10:80 gate
> >        # real=10.2.9.11:80 gate
> >        # real=10.2.9.12:80 gate
> >         service=http
> >         request="test.html"
> >         receive="Test Page"
> >         scheduler=wlc
> >         #persistent=600
> >         protocol=fwm
> 
> Hi,
>   it seems that some time between the release of Ultra Monkey 1.0.1 and
> the release of ldirectord 1.17 support for fwmark services in
> ldirectord beacme completely broken. The attached patch fixes this
> problem, and changes the default connectport to be taken from the real
> servers instead of the virtual service. I will commit this patch
> to cvs shortly if there are no objections.
> 
> In addition your configuration will need to include the checktype directive
> as follows.
> 
> virtual=1
>         real=10.2.9.10:80 gate
>        # real=10.2.9.11:80 gate
>        # real=10.2.9.12:80 gate
>         service=http
>         request="test.html"
>         receive="Test Page"
>         scheduler=wlc
>         #persistent=600
>         protocol=fwm
>       checktype=connect
> 
> 
> -- 
> Horms
> 

eholes.org * jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
eholes have feelings too...



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>