LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: ldirectord question

To: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ldirectord question
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Sanjay Jain <sjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 16:03:28 -0400
Virtual address should be in the  n.n.n.n:p format.

I hope this will help.
sanjay


Jeremy Hansen wrote:

> So I had a dream last night and it told me to try playing with fwmark
> stuff again.  I found an errata on UltraMonkey's page which I believe is
> what I was missing when I previously tried to get fwmark working before.
>
> But now I'm running into another problem with ldirectord, 1.17 included in
> heartbeat 0.4.8e
>
> My ldirectod.cf
>
> checktimeout=3
> checkinterval=1
>
> virtual=1
>         real=10.2.9.10:80 gate
>        # real=10.2.9.11:80 gate
>        # real=10.2.9.12:80 gate
>         service=http
>         request="test.html"
>         receive="Test Page"
>         scheduler=wlc
>         #persistent=600
>         protocol=fwm
>
> and this renders
>
> ld1: root:/etc/ha.d/conf 1202>ldirectord ldirectord.cf start
> Error reading file conf/ldirectord.cf at line 17: invalid address for
> virtual server
>
> which is confusing to me cause it's basically the same thing included in
> the ultramonkey example
>
> virtual=1
>         real=192.168.6.2:80 gate
>         real=192.168.6.3:80 gate
>         real=192.168.6.6:80 gate
>         service=http
>         request="index.html"
>         receive="Test Page"
>         scheduler=rr
>         #persistent=600
>
> Thanks for any help.  I don't need ldirectord of course just to test
> fwmark, but I will need it afterwards.
>
> -jeremy
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>