|
Any other ideas on this? All the examples and docs I see regarding using
fwmark say to use virtual=f. Did the format of the config changhe for
ldirectord?
Thanks
-jeremy
> Virtual address should be in the n.n.n.n:p format.
>
> I hope this will help.
> sanjay
>
>
> Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>
> > So I had a dream last night and it told me to try playing with fwmark
> > stuff again. I found an errata on UltraMonkey's page which I believe is
> > what I was missing when I previously tried to get fwmark working before.
> >
> > But now I'm running into another problem with ldirectord, 1.17 included in
> > heartbeat 0.4.8e
> >
> > My ldirectod.cf
> >
> > checktimeout=3
> > checkinterval=1
> >
> > virtual=1
> > real=10.2.9.10:80 gate
> > # real=10.2.9.11:80 gate
> > # real=10.2.9.12:80 gate
> > service=http
> > request="test.html"
> > receive="Test Page"
> > scheduler=wlc
> > #persistent=600
> > protocol=fwm
> >
> > and this renders
> >
> > ld1: root:/etc/ha.d/conf 1202>ldirectord ldirectord.cf start
> > Error reading file conf/ldirectord.cf at line 17: invalid address for
> > virtual server
> >
> > which is confusing to me cause it's basically the same thing included in
> > the ultramonkey example
> >
> > virtual=1
> > real=192.168.6.2:80 gate
> > real=192.168.6.3:80 gate
> > real=192.168.6.6:80 gate
> > service=http
> > request="index.html"
> > receive="Test Page"
> > scheduler=rr
> > #persistent=600
> >
> > Thanks for any help. I don't need ldirectord of course just to test
> > fwmark, but I will need it afterwards.
> >
> > -jeremy
> >
>
>
>
>
eholes.org * jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
eholes have feelings too...
|
