lvs-users
|
To: | Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Off topic: Realserver performance. |
Cc: | Benjamin Lee <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Thomas Proell <Thomas.Proell@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 19 Sep 2000 15:58:23 +0200 (MET DST) |
Hi! > with LVS you don't have that choice. Each real-server is loaded > progressivley attempting to keep the load the same on all machines. > You can't cut off one machine at a certain load. So, first you have to define what you mean with "load". It's easy to change any scheduler that way that he doesn't route to a server with more than "n" connections, which is a (not very good) approximation of "load". I'm writing on a scheduler that should lower the traffic to a "very loaded" server, which is not easy since "load" is hard to define. Any suggestions? Thomas |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Off Topic (Again) NFS -- which platform?, Joseph Mack |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: cluster load monitor, Joseph Mack |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Off topic: Realserver performance., Joseph Mack |
Next by Thread: | Re: Off topic: Realserver performance., Joseph Mack |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |