LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Off topic: Realserver performance.

To: Benjamin Lee <benjamin.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Off topic: Realserver performance.
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Proell <Thomas.Proell@xxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 11:00:21 -0400
Benjamin Lee wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 10:42:48AM -0400, Joseph Mack wrote:
> > A while ago someone posted a link to some mrtg/iptraff type gifs showing
> > the cpu/disk/IO for 4 identical real-servers for several hours. The graphs
> > for the real-servers were indistinguishable.
> >
.
.
> Secondly, that's good news though... because it means that LVS is doing its 
> job well.

It was a reassuring set of graphs.

> And that is to automagically (again a simulation is good here) wake up 
> additional real servers to help with the load 

this happens when you take machines off- and on-line for 
routine maintenance. In early verions of LVS the new machine, 
having least number of connections, would get all the new connections
and would be hammered to death. Code now adds a bit of a lag, 
so that the new machine isn't getting all the new connections.

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>