Re: LVS with mark tracking

[Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Julian Anastasov wrote:

>         Agreed. It seems an optional hook registering will be a good
> idea for LVS. Not sure how simple it can be done, with module options?
> How LVS will be tuned when it is compiled in the kernel. Because all
> useful features implemented together can collide or at least can drop
> the performance in some cases. We know that the LVS/NAT performance
> is critical for some users.

I think the natural way for a thing like this is to make a separate module that
installs the hook.

--
Henrik Nordstrom
SafeCore