Re: lvs, squid and efficiency

[Joe Cooper <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That's what the LBLC and DH schedulers are for.  (LBLC uses persistence 
memory, and DH uses a destination hash.  LBLC will lead to better 
balancing, DH is more scalable.)
Florin Andrei wrote:

> Suppose i have two real servers running Squid, and a LVS in front of
> them, with round-robin.
> Now, suppose one web page is cached on the first real server, a client
> requests that page, and LVS redirects it to the second real server. The
> result will be a cache miss, even if the object was stored into the
> other real server.
>
> Is there any way LVS can be combined with an HTTP proxy, and not loose
> cache efficiency?

                                  --
                     Joe Cooper <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                 Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
                        http://www.swelltech.com