|
Dear Florin,
I would suggest that you peer the two servers. If a cache miss occurs on
one server then with peering it will first contact the other server to
see if it has the item in it's cache. If that fails the first server
will then go and do a direct fetch. If you set up the 2 servers so that
they peer each other this would help your case alot.
Yours sincerely
David Ruwoldt
Florin Andrei wrote:
>
> Suppose i have two real servers running Squid, and a LVS in front of
> them, with round-robin.
> Now, suppose one web page is cached on the first real server, a client
> requests that page, and LVS redirects it to the second real server. The
> result will be a cache miss, even if the object was stored into the
> other real server.
>
> Is there any way LVS can be combined with an HTTP proxy, and not loose
> cache efficiency?
>
> --
> Florin Andrei
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
--
David Ruwoldt
Senior Systems Specialist
Information Technology Services
Level 7, 10 Pulteney St
ADELAIDE UNIVERSITY SA 5005
AUSTRALIA
-----------------------------------------------------------
This email message is intended only for the addressee(s)
and contains information which may be confidential and/or
copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please
do not read, save, forward, disclose, or copy the contents
of this email. If this email has been sent to you in error,
please notify the sender by reply email and delete this
email and any copies or links to this email completely and
immediately from your system. No representation is made
that this email is free of viruses. Virus scanning is
recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.
David.Ruwoldt.vcf
Description: Card for David Ruwoldt
|
