Re: lvs, squid and efficiency

[Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>]

On 20 Mar 2001 16:20:50 -0500, Joseph Mack wrote:
> Florin Andrei wrote:
> > 
> > How stable is -dh? Has been tested with kernel-2.4 a lot?
> 
> <exuberant sales pitch>
> It's brand new in 2.4. It's the usual LVS quality and you 
> could be one of the first to try it out :-) (step this way...)

lol...

Ok. Now i'm evaluating many different cache clusters: LVS, usual ICP,
digests, and so on.
There are pros and cons for each one.
Seems like LVS in front of a good server farm is the best for me. Only
the scheduler remains to be chosen.
-dh looks very nice. Maybe the load will be distributed a little bit
unevenly with it, but the overall performance have to be better.

-- 
Florin Andrei