LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: lvs, squid and efficiency

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: lvs, squid and efficiency
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 06:21:10 -0500
Florin Andrei wrote:
> 
> On 20 Mar 2001 11:11:00 +1030, David Ruwoldt wrote:
> >
> > If it does'nt fail then the server simply gets the data from the other
> > server and places it in its own cache. Example
> >
> > So you would want each server to peer with the other. If you lose a
> > server then the server that is still up will just go direct to the web
> > as it could not contact the other server. Hope this makes sense.
> 
> That's great! So, actually, i only need to use persistent port (besides
> peering proxies). Just like the guys from JANET did.

well yes, you have the idea, but the -dh scheduler handles that for you.
You don't want to go to the peer if you can go to the box that has the data.

Joe


-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>