Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello Joe,
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:
>
> > I am trying to set up two fwmarks groups
> >
> > 1. ftp,ftp-data
> > 2. http,https
> >
> > I expect ftp requests to go to group 1, but they go to group 2.
>
> May be the problem is that the two services share same Virtual
> IP addresses and you first tried http/https connections that created
I tried ftp first and it went to group 2.
> the persistence template and then you tried ftp and may because there
> is already template for the same VIP already to real server from group
> 2 the connection was scheduled to this group.
>
> May be we have to port the persistent-fwmark-1.0.5-2.2.18-1.diff
> patch for 2.4 and you to test it with your setup. This patch simply
> uses per-service persistence, not the default per-VIP persistence.
I will try 1.0.5. Have just been for a walk to see if I could figure
it out. I realise I have to try this with 2.2.x anyhow.
> May be until then you can try the same setup for 2.2 after applying
> the above patch (from /~julian/), of course, if it is easy. I'll make
> the patch after 4-5 hours.
! - is this a great team or what
let me test 2.2.x first (I may not get back to you today)
I would like scheduling to go by fwmark groups
rather than by VIP (if I have the choice)
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|