|
Hello Joe,
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:
> > Yes, in fact the patch tries to group different VIPs in one
> > fwmark-based service but may be it solves problems when two persistent
> > fwmark services share same VIPs and RIPs. May be I'll test it soon
> > too. There is no difference in the delivery but the connections are
> > accounted in the wrong place (real and virtual service). But I have
> > to debug this setup too.
>
> will this break existing setups?
I assume the right answer is "No" :)
> > Agreed. Currently the templates created from two fwmark services
> > collide when they share same VIP and there are same RIPs.
>
> we could call it a "new feature" :-)
Not sure :) The patch against 2.4 is attached (I still
didn't tested it).
> Joe
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
persistent-fwmark-0.2.8-2.4-1.diff
Description: Persistent fwmark, v1 against 0.2.8, Linux 2.4
|
