lvs-users
|
|
lvs-users
|
| To: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: multigroup fwmark question |
| Cc: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tpavlic@xxxxxxxxxxx, horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx, wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ratz@xxxxxx |
| From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Apr 2001 20:58:02 +0300 (EEST) |
Hello Joe,
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:
> > May be we have to port the persistent-fwmark-1.0.5-2.2.18-1.diff
>
> I did it with 1.0.6-2.2.19 and got the opposite, both groups going to fwmark
> 1.
With the persistent-fwmark patch applied?
> Should I try 1.0.5-2.2.18?
No
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
> contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
> mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: multigroup fwmark question, Joseph Mack |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: multigroup fwmark question, Joseph Mack |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: multigroup fwmark question, Joseph Mack |
| Next by Thread: | Re: multigroup fwmark question, Joseph Mack |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |