|
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello Joe,
>
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:
>
> > > Yes, in fact the patch tries to group different VIPs in one
> > > fwmark-based service but may be it solves problems when two persistent
> > > fwmark services share same VIPs and RIPs. May be I'll test it soon
> > > too. There is no difference in the delivery but the connections are
> > > accounted in the wrong place (real and virtual service). But I have
> > > to debug this setup too.
> >
> > will this break existing setups?
>
> I assume the right answer is "No" :)
well I don't know. As long as everyone knows when they
upgrade I guess it's OK.
> > > Agreed. Currently the templates created from two fwmark services
> > > collide when they share same VIP and there are same RIPs.
> >
> > we could call it a "new feature" :-)
>
> Not sure :) The patch against 2.4 is attached (I still
> didn't tested it).
thanks
just got home. Will look at it tomorrow.
All my 2.2.x kernel compiles are hosed, even from clean source files.
my 2.4.x compiles are OK
-DEXPORT_SYMTAB is not being defined. I haven't looked to see
why.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
