I've just completed the Rsync deployment method, this works very well. I
find this method vastly superiors to both other methods we discussed.
Using Rsync allows me to only use 2 HOSTS and I can still provide 100%
uptime. In the other method I need 3 systems to provide 100% uptime.
In addition the Rsync method is far easier to maintain and setup.
Thoughts?
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Baker" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: MySQL Replication
> Michael McConnell wrote:
> > Paul you are correct. My apologizes.
>
> You don't have to apologize. Trying to explain it to you only helps me
> understand it better as well. :-)
>
> >
> > I've just done this experiment.
> >
> > A(master) -> B(slave)
> > B(master -> C(slave)
> >
> > A Died.
> > Turn of C's Database, tar it up, replicated the Data to A
> > Activate A as Slave to C
> >
> > No data loss, and 0 downtime.
> >
>
> Glad to have helped you anyway I can!!!
> --
> =======================================================================
> Paul J. Baker Internet Systems Developer
> pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Where2GetIt.com
> phone 847-498-0111x234
> fax 847-480-7422
> =======================================================================
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|