![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MySQL Replication |
| From: | Paul Baker <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:12:17 -0500 |
Michael McConnell wrote: Keep in mind, there are no *real time* replication methods available for MySQL. Running with MySQL's building Replication commonly results (at least with a 6 gig / 400 megs changing) in as much as 1 hour of data inconsistency. The only way to get true real time is to use a shared storage array. MySQL builtin replication is supposed to be "realtime" AFAIK. It should only fall behind when the slave is doing selects against a database that causes changes to wait until the selects are complete. Unless you have a select that is taking an hour, there is no reason it should fall that far behind. Have you discussed your findings with the MySQL developers? -- ======================================================================= Paul J. Baker Internet Systems Developer pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Where2GetIt.com phone 847-498-0111x234 fax 847-480-7422 ======================================================================= |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: MySQL Replication, Michael McConnell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: heartbeat between LVS machines, Peter Mueller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MySQL Replication, Michael McConnell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MySQL Replication, Michael McConnell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |