lvs-users
|
To: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: lvs-NAT ftp (Kernel 2.4.19) |
Cc: | "lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:38:55 +0200 (EET) |
Hello, On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Joseph Mack wrote: > ipvs-0.9.4 > LVS-NAT > ip_vs_ftp ip_vs_ftp shows difference compared to 1.0.6. In 0.9.6 ip_vs_ftp was fixed not to use skb->h pointer because by this way last data bytes in payload are ignored, may be this is the problem in 0.9.4 - we can't catch the data in RS reply. This pointer is valid only in LOCAL_IN, not in FORWARD. If you like outdated versions, you can try with 0.9.6 :) > Joe Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: ipvs/ipvsadm version?, Alex Kramarov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ANNOUNCE] ipvs 1.0.7, Wensong Zhang |
Previous by Thread: | Re: lvs-NAT ftp (Kernel 2.4.19), Joseph Mack |
Next by Thread: | ipvs-1.0.7pre1, Wensong Zhang |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |