LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Persistence and faillover

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Persistence and faillover
From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:05:21 +0100
Hi Horms,

I am still stronly of the opinion that the sysctl variables should
be documented in the ipvsadm man page as they are stronly tied to its
behaviour.

At the moment we are in a completely half-arsed situation where
some are documented in ipvsadm(8), while all documented in sysctl.html
Yet there is no reference to sysctl.html in ipvsadm(8). Why???!!!

My preference is to merge all the information in sysctl.html into
ipvsadm(8) or perhaps a separeate man page. If this is not acceptable
then I would advocate removing all of the sysctl infromation from
ipvsadm(8) and replacing it with a reference to sysctl.html.
Though to be honest, why half the information on configuring LVS
should be in ipvsadm(8) and the other half in sysctl.html
is beyond me.

... and I'm still on your side on this. For exactly the same reasons plus the ones I've mentioned before when this issue was raised.

Maybe if we get enough LVS users feedback on it we might convince Wensong after all (hint, hint). Here are the references for other regular readers and happy LVS users of this list:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=103733983113314&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=105115848115129&w=2

Thanks and best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>