|
It's not (yet) a production system, so I've no problem using 2.6. One
question, though -- now that I have one director running, what solutions
do people use to make a backup director that takes over fairly quickly
when the main one fails? I've been planning on starting with linux-ha...
Josh
Peter Mueller wrote:
Just a note -- I love the software so far :) After installing a 2.6
kernel, configuring ipvs, and realizing I needed to add
Glad it's working well for you. You're very brave to use 2.6, most of us
are chickens here :).
In my experience LVS is much more reliable than Local Directors, and much
more versatile than F5 servers. During the 3+ years I've been lurking on
the list and using LVS I believe I've seen 1 serious "you should upgrade
right away" bug, and that bug was only an SMP race condition. (Most people
use LVS in UP mode anyway).
Cheers,
P
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 3/18/2004
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
--
Josh Tolley
Raintree Systems, Inc.
http://www.raintreeinc.com
760 509 9000
|
