LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Way to go, LVS

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Way to go, LVS
From: Jim Nachlin <jnachlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:17:10 -0500 (EST)
I'm actually using perl scripts.  Maybe this is crazy, but it
seemed that keepalived and ultramonkey were too much solution for
an essentially simple problem.  Glad to share perl scripts I
have, though they are not yet complete.

-Jim


On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Peter Mueller wrote:

> > It's not (yet) a production system, so I've no problem using 2.6. One
> > question, though -- now that I have one director running,
> > what solutions
> > do people use to make a backup director that takes over
> > fairly quickly
> > when the main one fails? I've been planning on starting with
> > linux-ha...
>
> I think almost everyone uses linux-ha (through www.ultramonkey.org) or
> keepalived (www.keepalived.org).  I would look at both if I were you.
> Ultramonkey allows you to use serial & other connections and is more stable,
> while keepalived has snazzy new features and (in my experience) faster
> failover times.  I use both; keepalived for VRRP-routers and Ultramonkey for
> production LVS servers.
>
> Oh, and just in case you didn't find that confusing enough, I think the
> userbase is split about 50/50 now ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> P
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>