LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Way to go, LVS

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Way to go, LVS
From: Simon Young <simon-lvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:42:08 +0000
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:20:53AM -0800, Josh Tolley wrote:
> 
> It's not (yet) a production system, so I've no problem using 2.6. One
> question, though -- now that I have one director running, what
> solutions do people use to make a backup director that takes over
> fairly quickly when the main one fails? I've been planning on starting
> with linux-ha...

I'm using keepalived at the moment. For my purposes (redundant web
servers, http and https, multiple VIPs) it's a really, really
straightforward configuration, and it handles both realserver and
director failover like a dream.

I initially set up one director with keepalived and made sure the
healthchecks were working properly for realserver failover, then
duplicated the machine and made sure the second one was working as a
single director too.

Then all I had to do was add the vrrp section to the config file and
restart keepalived on both machines. It's been running happily ever
since. I'm very impressed with it, and the best thing is there's only
one configuration file per director! And you can write your own
healthchecks too, although I haven't needed to do this yet.

In short, I'm a fan :-)

All the best,

Simon.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>