lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Taking out realserver for maintenance |
From: | Jan Bruvoll <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:57:24 +0100 |
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > [...] > > If they're connected, it doesn't matter what the timeout is. > > Joe > Hm ok - my reasoning for doing that is that these clients are relatively long-lived SSL-based connection from an in-house application to our server park - and that by setting the persistence to 5 seconds, only connections that "come back" within 5 seconds of disconnecting from this particular server (for whatever reason - Apache timeout, client disconnection, network problems, etc.) would be directed to the same server - if not, they would then hopefully be directed to one of the servers with weight>0 - or is my thinking wrong here? Best regards Jan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Taking out realserver for maintenance, Joseph Mack NA3T |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not translated), Jari Takkala |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Taking out realserver for maintenance, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Next by Thread: | Re: Taking out realserver for maintenance, Joseph Mack NA3T |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |