LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

RE: 'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not translated)

from [Graeme Fowler] [Permanent Link]
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: 'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not translated)
From: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:22:28 +0100 
Hi

On Thu 25 Aug 2005 15:14:44 BST , Jari Takkala <Jari.Takkala@xxxxxx> wrote:

Has anyone been able to look at this problem?


I haven't, as I'm in the dying throes of a datacentre migration project.
As an aside, one cluster which I just replaced used to run 2.4.x and is now a 2.6.12 kernel, and it's sooooo much nicer to use - the arp problem is far easier to manage in 2.6.x :) 

Graeme
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: 'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not translated), Jari Takkala
Next by Date:  RE: LVS chokes on 600+ connections, Francois JEANMOUGIN
Previous by Thread:  RE: 'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not translated), Jari Takkala
Next by Thread:  RE: 'no hit' for LVS connection tracking (SYN+ACK not translated), Julian Anastasov
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]