|To:||"LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: LVS-NAT Active FTP issue...|
|Cc:||Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>|
|From:||Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:41:36 -0800 (PST)|
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Mark de Vries wrote:
I don't think that would help much. The src port is not always the same. vsftpd (prolly) just connects without binding to a specific port, just getting a random one in the ip_local_port_range...
so I only need to put in a note of caution in the HOWTO?
Is there anything against not matching on the src port like the ip_contrack(_ftp) stuff?
you mean figure out the data-port on the fly? Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant mapgenerator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: Help with ip_vs_ctl.c~ipvs-deadlock-fix patch and RedHat ES 4, Roberto Nibali|
|Next by Date:||Re: Does lvs syncd handle persistent connections?, Ranga Nathan|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: LVS-NAT Active FTP issue..., Mark de Vries|
|Next by Thread:||Re: LVS-NAT Active FTP issue..., Mark de Vries|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|