LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: just added a new real server, getting a really large number of InAct

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: just added a new real server, getting a really large number of InActConn
From: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:46:40 +0000
Hi

On Tue 07 Feb 2006 16:02:24 GMT , Randy Paries <rtparies@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just added a new Real Server to my cluster

local.lovejoy is the one i just added.
<snip>
ipvsadm
IP Virtual Server version 1.0.10 (size=65536)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
 -> RemoteAddress:Port           Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP  www.unitnet.com:http wlc persistent 1800 mask 255.255.255.0
 -> local.lovejoy:http           Route   1      113        5568
 -> local.krusty:http            Route   1      97         223
 -> local.flanders:http          Route   1      91         158
TCP  www.unitnet.com:https wlc persistent 1800 mask 255.255.255.0
 -> local.flanders:https         Route   1      0          12

The newer machine is a newer OS, running a newer version of Apache and probably newer hardware (OK, those last two are assumptions) - I bet it's responding more quickly.

The InActConn counter diaplays thso connection in TIME_WAIT or related states, after a FIN packet has arrived to end the connection. If you run:

ipvsadm -Ln --persistent-conn --sort --rate

and ipvsadm -Ln --persistent-conn --sort --stats

You will probably see that lovejoy is handling rather more traffic than krusty and flanders.

Graeme


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>