LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: just added a new real server, getting a really large number of InAct

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: just added a new real server, getting a really large number of InActConn
From: Randy Paries <rtparies@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:54:17 -0600
I am running an older version of ipvsadm so i can only do the following
Does this give you any insight?

ipvsadm -Ln --rate
IP Virtual Server version 1.0.10 (size=65536)
Prot LocalAddress:Port                 CPS    InPPS   OutPPS    InBPS   OutBPS
  -> RemoteAddress:Port
TCP  66.208.187.10:80                   61     1220        0   108590        0
  -> 192.168.0.159:80                   52      867        0    72101        0
  -> 192.168.0.204:80                    5      138        0    16551        0
  -> 192.168.0.203:80                    4      214        0    19937        0
TCP  66.208.187.10:443                   0        0        0        0        0
  -> 192.168.0.203:443                   0        0        0        0        0

ipvsadm  -Ln --stats
IP Virtual Server version 1.0.10 (size=65536)
Prot LocalAddress:Port               Conns   InPkts  OutPkts  InBytes OutBytes
  -> RemoteAddress:Port
TCP  66.208.187.10:80             22291846    1257M        0     152G        0
  -> 192.168.0.159:80               742593  8850902        0  998205K        0
  -> 192.168.0.204:80             10094273  593304K        0   71634M        0
  -> 192.168.0.203:80             11422135  655111K        0   80084M        0
TCP  66.208.187.10:443              117751   993403        0  155060K        0
  -> 192.168.0.203:443               49549   419180        0 66259192        0



On 2/7/06, Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue 07 Feb 2006 16:02:24 GMT , Randy Paries <rtparies@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I just added a new Real Server to my cluster
> >
> > local.lovejoy is the one i just added.
> <snip>
> > ipvsadm
> > IP Virtual Server version 1.0.10 (size=65536)
> > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> >  -> RemoteAddress:Port           Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> > TCP  www.unitnet.com:http wlc persistent 1800 mask 255.255.255.0
> >  -> local.lovejoy:http           Route   1      113        5568
> >  -> local.krusty:http            Route   1      97         223
> >  -> local.flanders:http          Route   1      91         158
> > TCP  www.unitnet.com:https wlc persistent 1800 mask 255.255.255.0
> >  -> local.flanders:https         Route   1      0          12
>
> The newer machine is a newer OS, running a newer version of Apache and
> probably newer hardware (OK, those last two are assumptions) - I bet
> it's responding more quickly.
>
> The InActConn counter diaplays thso connection in TIME_WAIT or related
> states, after a FIN packet has arrived to end the connection. If you
> run:
>
> ipvsadm -Ln --persistent-conn --sort --rate
>
> and ipvsadm -Ln --persistent-conn --sort --stats
>
> You will probably see that lovejoy is handling rather more traffic than
> krusty and flanders.
>
> Graeme
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>