LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Keepalived Director failover, LVS-TUN

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Keepalived Director failover, LVS-TUN
From: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:21:29 +0000
Hi again

On Thu 09 Feb 2006 15:50:17 GMT , Matt Chan <engineuity@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ok, switched track interface to eth0, but still get the same loop...

Hmm. Is there a space between the end of track_interface and the opening brace? This looks for all the world like a syntax problem (albeit not a very obvious one). It might be worth you posting the whole block again as it is now.

I dont believe we are using HT P4s. From /proc/cpuinfo: Intel(R) Pentium(R)
4 CPU 1.80GHz. Both directors have the same setup. I think the smp was
chosen because right now we are running these as test boxes. If all goes
well though, we will get dedicated server boxes for production use (most
likely HT P4s). Since this is not a HT proc, should this still cause
conflict?

Not as far as I know, no.

Graeme



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>