lvs-users
|
To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: connection sync at failover, email, and using only basic IPmgmt |
From: | Dominik Klein <dk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:38:48 +0100 |
The scenario I see is an existing connection that matched firewall rules getting dropped by the backup iptables rules when he switches to master because his iptables state wasn't aware of the connection. Is that a correct assessment?More than likely, yes. I'm not aware of anything to sync the iptables conntrack tables (which is what you're talking about). Personally I think that a connection drop at router failover is acceptable; it's rather better than having a complete outage. Untested, but there seems to be something about ipvs and iptables connection states: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/ Regards Dominikps. could someone please comment on my problem with preempt_delay posted last week? :) |
Previous by Date: | RE: connection sync at failover, email, and using only basic IPmgmt, Graeme Fowler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | script + heartbeat, Mailhebuau Christophe |
Previous by Thread: | RE: connection sync at failover, email, and using only basic IPmgmt, Graeme Fowler |
Next by Thread: | RE: connection sync at failover, email, and using only basic IPmgmt, Richard Pickett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |