![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [lvs-users] no VIP up on real server? was: Re: arp problem with 2.6.X red hat kernels? |
| From: | ipvs user <ipvsuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:09:54 -0700 |
But Dan are you planning to use this for a high performance set up like last time? If so, I think there have been some people here who noticed some major performance hits when using iptables. Just FYI... Dan Yocum wrote: >> With LVS-DR, if you have an iptables rule such as 'iptables -t nat -A >> PREROUTING -d VIP -p tcp --dport PORT -j REDIRECT' you would not need to have >> the VIP configured on the real servers. > > Cool. This is what I have on the real servers, and by all indications > (e.g., watching tcpdump) it's working as expected. I hope something > isn't going to pop up and bite me in the butt by doing this (usually the > Networking Group here at Fermi ;-). > > Since everything is working right now, I think I'm going to declare > victory and move on. > > Thanks for the reminders, > Dan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] no VIP up on real server? was: Re: arp problem with 2.6.X red hat kernels?, Dan Yocum |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [lvs-users] no VIP up on real server? was: Re: arp problem with 2.6.X red hat kernels?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] no VIP up on real server? was: Re: arp problem with 2.6.X red hat kernels?, Dan Yocum |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [lvs-users] no VIP up on real server? was: Re: arp problem with 2.6.X red hat kernels?, Joseph Mack NA3T |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |