LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] no VIP up on real server? was: Re: arp problem with 2.6.

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] no VIP up on real server? was: Re: arp problem with 2.6.X red hat kernels?
From: ipvs user <ipvsuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 03:35:26 -0700
When I said here, I meant on the list... I thought that was the conclusion of 
the "iptables on LB and connection limit?" thread or maybe one other in the 
past year, but I could be sorely mistaken or it is my subconscious dislike of 
iptables taking over  :)  but I coulda swore I read something to that effect, 
because I remember thinking "Note to self: don't use iptables on high 
connection rate systems".

You obviously have a better handle on this stuff being the author of the 
how-to (which should be re-named "The LVS Encyclopedia" since it is much more 
comprehensive than most sparse HOW-TOs).

Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, ipvs user wrote:
> 
>> But Dan are you planning to use this for a high performance set up like last 
>> time?
>> If so, I think there have been some people here who noticed some major
>> performance hits when using iptables. Just FYI...
> 
> I didn't find any in the 2.2 kernels (see my Performance 
> Paper).
> 
> Where did you see people getting major performance hits?
> 
> Joe


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>