> You're trying to setup a NAT config, yes?
>
> Do the realservers have a route back through the second director? I'd
> hazard a guess that they don't. If they don't, the traffic will be
> trying to exit via the first director (which you say is working) and
> will never get un-NATted back to the client.
>
> For a HA setup using NAT you need to ensure that the *internal* gateway
> - the one the realservers use - can float between the directors, but
> note that it will only ever work on one at a time.
>
Hi Graeme,
Thank you for your response. Yes, you are right, it seems to be the problem.
In that situation, what is recommended routing technique to achieve
high availability ? NAT obviously is not, since I would need to change
default gw with every failover, which is not simple at all. Direct
routing is not an option, since I would like to have real servers in
private IP range. Would direct routing do the job then ?
Best regards,
Dusan
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|