LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: IPVS Benchmarking

To: Ray Bellis <rpb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPVS Benchmarking
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:09:57 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:

> > FYI, we have our LVS system working now, with LVS redundancy achieved by
> > running OSPF routing (gated) on the LVS-NAT servers and having the VIP
> > within the same IP subnet as the RIPs so that IGP routing policies
> > automatically determine which LVS router the packets arrive on.

I can't figure out what you're doing here. From what I know you can't have
the VIP and the RIPs on the same subnet with VS-NAT. Is gated running on
the realservers? What is made redundant by your setup - the realservers,
the director or the whole LVS (director+realservers)?

> 
> Yes, thats one option. Even better than heartbeat and IPAT, if all your
> systems support running a routing protocol.

what is a system - a machine or an LVS (director+realservers)?

Joe
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx


----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>